1 |
Am Mittwoch 06 Juni 2007 17:42 schrieb Ciaran McCreesh: |
2 |
> > Is there a way to fix the current system, or should it be chucked |
3 |
> > entirely, as has been suggested? |
4 |
> |
5 |
> The problem is not so much the system as a small number of the |
6 |
> proctors. |
7 |
|
8 |
I feel like _anyone_* who willingly acts against a |
9 |
dont-reply-warning/thread-time-out which was recognized as such are to be |
10 |
banned, and therefore I dont really see the problem, except that someone |
11 |
maybe did _not_ recognize the warning as such, although Roy changed topic and |
12 |
signed with proctors. |
13 |
To fix this, one could additionally use proctors@g.o or so, which |
14 |
should make it _very_ clear that this is not a personal "please, calm down |
15 |
everybody"-mail |
16 |
It's different, of course, if someone didnt yet recieve the proctors warning, |
17 |
and sent a reply within minutes, which wasn't the case as the mails where |
18 |
sent as reply to Roys mail, so... |
19 |
|
20 |
* council and proctors excepted |
21 |
-- |
22 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |