1 |
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:29:09 +0200 |
2 |
Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> I thought last Zac suggestion of ABI_SLOT modified to use |
4 |
> "SLOT=ble/bla" was clear enough and we reached a consensus. |
5 |
|
6 |
Possibly. I'm waiting to see an implementation, a bunch of examples and |
7 |
a comparison with just using SLOT and := or :*. |
8 |
|
9 |
> About what I am trying to solve, I have explained it multiple times in |
10 |
> involved thread and won't repeat them once again. |
11 |
|
12 |
Describing the problem clearly and correctly, and in the appropriate |
13 |
amount of generality, is the hardest and most important part of the |
14 |
process. Figuring out what we're trying to solve is far harder than |
15 |
writing a bit of code. |
16 |
|
17 |
-- |
18 |
Ciaran McCreesh |