| 1 |
On Sat, 2019-09-21 at 09:17 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> We currently have @BINARY-REDISTRIBUTABLE license group that somewhat |
| 5 |
> concerns RESTRICT=bindist. I think it'd be reasonable to introduce |
| 6 |
> a matching group concerning RESTRICT=mirror. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> My proposition would be to add @DISTFILE-REDISTRIBUTABLE group with |
| 9 |
> the following rules: |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> - MUST permit redistribution of unmodified distfiles |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> - MUST NOT require explicit approval (No items from @EULA) |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
After some further research, it turns out we have some @EULAs that |
| 16 |
permit redistributing unmodified sources. Maybe we should drop this |
| 17 |
item then. Or do we want to flag them mirror-restricted anyway? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Best regards, |
| 21 |
Michał Górny |
Archives