Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 16:18:30
Message-Id: 56C0A88F.7000405@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider by Rich Freeman
1 On 02/14/2016 05:00 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
2 > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> wrote:
3 >> If, for any reason, eudev should be abandoned - we can just change the
4 >> virtual back. One-line change.
5 > Which is precisely the corresponding argument for not switching the
6 > default to eudev in the first place.
7 >
8 That no sense :)
9
10 Since we're, right now, already using an unsupported version ...
11 Can't get worse.
12
13 And since you argued for mainstream earlier you'd have to agree that
14 eudev is the mainstream solution and Gentoo is lagging behind the others ...