1 |
Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
2 |
> I wouldn't mind seeing an actual "unstable" designation added to |
3 |
> KEYWORDS. The basic premise would be like package.mask packages where |
4 |
> things can be done *within the tree* but still has the same air of "this |
5 |
> might be totally busted at some point" as overlays. Users would be very |
6 |
> unlikely to run unstable on their machines. Heck, we could even make it |
7 |
> impossible to actually use unstable globally if we wanted to. |
8 |
|
9 |
Sounds like package.mask / -* right now. |
10 |
|
11 |
Thanks, |
12 |
Donnie |