1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
5 |
| On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 15:06:34 -0600 R Hill <dirtyepic.sk@×××××.com> |
6 |
| wrote: |
7 |
| | Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
8 |
| | > I've been going through the EBUILD list at random and providing |
9 |
| | > lists of things that need to be fixed before the ebuild can be |
10 |
| | > considered for inclusion. The WONTFIX resolution along with a |
11 |
| | > comment asking for the submitter to reopen with a fixed ebuild is |
12 |
| | > used when problems are found. |
13 |
| | |
14 |
| | Is it possible to leave these bugs in an open state? |
15 |
| |
16 |
| I'd rather not... There're 600+ items on the list, it's too hard to |
17 |
| maintain. |
18 |
| |
19 |
| | WONTFIX doesn't seem the right tool for the job: |
20 |
| | |
21 |
| | WONTFIX |
22 |
| | The problem described is a bug which will never be fixed. |
23 |
| |
24 |
| And the ebuild attached will never be 'fixed' in the state it is in. |
25 |
|
26 |
I might use NEEDINFO instead, but it all depends on the people looking |
27 |
at the bug. |
28 |
|
29 |
Donnie |
30 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
31 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) |
32 |
|
33 |
iD8DBQFDB6uXXVaO67S1rtsRAgn+AJ4hUEjFYFQyXiKhmRwlKPM9o5sAJACfbiZd |
34 |
LLickXtb907fd+ZIAKyTcqE= |
35 |
=9HEk |
36 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
37 |
-- |
38 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |