| 1 |
2008-04-03 13:35 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto <jmbsvicetto@g.o> napisał(a): |
| 2 |
> Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto kirjoitti: |
| 4 |
> > > As a final thought, I think this point is a tangent to the old debate |
| 5 |
> about tree-wide commit privileges and or the scm of the tree. Afterall, if |
| 6 |
> gentoo-x86 was a git tree and or we had acls in the tree, I don't think we |
| 7 |
> would be having or would need to have this argument. |
| 8 |
> > > |
| 9 |
> > > |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > If we used git, proxy maintaining would be easier. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> True, but with some acls we could also have a different model where people |
| 15 |
> worked on parts of the tree and where commit privileges didn't pose so many |
| 16 |
> security risks. With the current practice of doing work in overlays it would |
| 17 |
> also be simpler to merge the work back into the Portage tree. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Also Subversion would be sufficient. |
| 20 |
éí¢‡^¾X¬¶È žÚ(¢¸&j)bž b² |
Archives