Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Alexander Gretencord <arutha@×××.de>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] syslog-ng
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 04:25:14
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] syslog-ng by
1 On Thursday 10 October 2002 19:23, ace@××××××.org wrote:
2 > Who monitors security warnings for Gentoo? syslog-ng has a bug (#7951) but
3 > it hasn't been comitted to the portage tree, and it has been over a week,
4 > does the freeze INCLUDE SECURITY UPDATES where all that is needed is a
5 > version bump.
7 No it shouldn't. Even KDE gets new versions. Has it been assigned directly to
8 blocke@g.o? If so, don't do it. The bug-wranglers will decide who to
9 assign it to. Btw if something like this doesn't get fixed get into the irc
10 channel and bug them about it :)
12 Btw this is one of the things that makes gentoo bad for server usage. Way to
13 go gentoo but I'm sure they will get this right too ... sometime :)
16 Alex
18 --
19 "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
20 deserve neither liberty nor safety."
21 Benjamin Franklin


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] syslog-ng "Bruce A. Locke" <blocke@××××××.org>