| 1 |
On Mon, 2004-10-04 at 00:36, Travis Tilley wrote: |
| 2 |
> Doug Goldstein wrote: |
| 3 |
> > let's add support for this switching into gcc-config and that way people |
| 4 |
> > won't have to remember the full path to the spec file... it'd know it |
| 5 |
> > based on the profile info. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> ask.. and ye -shall- receive! BEHOLD! |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> ayanami gcc # gcc-config -l |
| 10 |
> [1] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.2 |
| 11 |
> [2] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.2-hardenednossp |
| 12 |
> [3] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.2-vanilla |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> ^_^ |
| 15 |
> this is with a USE=hardened gcc. if you're not installing with |
| 16 |
> USE=hardened, replace that vanilla option with a hardened option. and |
| 17 |
> bam... the promise in the subject of this e-mail is fulfilled. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> hardened specs file logic is now installed by default for all gcc |
| 20 |
> 3.4.2-r2 installs, it's just not enabled by default unless hardened is |
| 21 |
> in USE. next step... world domination. oh yeah. :) |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> at some point we need to see if upstream would even consider integrating |
| 24 |
> some of our less invasive gentoo-specific patches, like the GCC_SPECS |
| 25 |
> support and some of the pie logic cleanups. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
I have an aversion with dealing with redhat myself for just about |
| 28 |
anything these days. But I can think of a few things that would be nice |
| 29 |
to unload to avoid the patching nightmares. If your game or find out |
| 30 |
somebody else that is then please let me know. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> Travis Tilley |
| 35 |
> Gentoo/AMD64/toolchain/hardened?/other |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> -- |
| 38 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
| 41 |
Gentoo (hardened,security,infrastructure,embedded,toolchain) Developer |
Archives