Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation?
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:49:28
Message-Id: 20130429194917.46d4985c@googlemail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? by Mike Frysinger
1 On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:36:41 -0400
2 Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote:
3 > On Monday 29 April 2013 01:55:49 Michał Górny wrote:
4 > > Now, what are your thoughts? Shall we fix PMS to explicitly state
5 > > the argument order or implement ugly hacks in ebuilds?
6 >
7 > portage has always inserted implicit args before the args given by
8 > the ebuild to econf. PMS omitting the ordering information is simply
9 > an oversight to be clarified, not functionality that may be relied
10 > upon.
11
12 As you can see in the bug, we're not discussing anything related to EAPI
13 0 behaviour, so this argument is irrelevant. We're discussing a change
14 in a later EAPI, where the change had nothing to say about ordering.
15
16 --
17 Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies