| 1 |
Alexandre Buisse wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, Apr 4, 2006 at 00:37:12 +0200, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>>On Mon, 3 Apr 2006 17:38:48 -0400 Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |
| 6 |
>>wrote: |
| 7 |
>>| i dont see how anyone can be against this (unless you're a |
| 8 |
>>| terrorist!) |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>>I for one welcome our new infra overlords. Perhaps you should add in a |
| 11 |
>>clause saying that infra will randomly (maybe with the help of a |
| 12 |
>>keyword filter) inspect emails sent to all @gentoo.org addresses for |
| 13 |
>>any signs of subversive activity. You could also add a clause saying |
| 14 |
>>that developers must hand over their harddrives to infra upon request so |
| 15 |
>>that security audits can be performed. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> I fail to see how your remark relates to the document. It's not about |
| 19 |
> anti-terrorism measures or anything, it's just about good behaviour so |
| 20 |
> gentoo can work properly and we can all have fun working in it. Or |
| 21 |
> should we start another flame each time a document is posted to -dev? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Sorry, but you aren't a Gentoo developer and don't have access to some |
| 24 |
mailing list archives. If you were, you'd know. Sure, the part about |
| 25 |
good will etc is good. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Anyway, I don't think this is a good place for such discusion. -core? |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Cheers, |
| 30 |
-jkt |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth |
Archives