| 1 |
Hi, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> On Monday, January 24, 2011 07:31:20 Christian Faulhammer wrote: |
| 6 |
> > over the course of the years the x86 (and other architectures as |
| 7 |
> > well) has given away permissions to maintainers/teams to mark |
| 8 |
> > packages stable themselves. As there never was a definitive list |
| 9 |
> > what exceptions exist, I compiled a list of the ones I could get |
| 10 |
> > from the top of my head in [1]. Please yell if you have those |
| 11 |
> > permissions so I can complete the list for reference purposes. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> how about we extend metadata.xml to avoid the "multiple data |
| 14 |
> locations always leads to bitrot" ? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Sounds like an excellent idea. Who can add this? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
V-Li |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project |
| 22 |
<URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
<URL:http://gentoo.faulhammer.org/> |
Archives