1 |
On Wed, 9 Sep 2015 00:24:55 -0700 Daniel Campbell wrote: |
2 |
> > For stability and maintainability, I'd prefer www-client/chromium |
3 |
> > to use the upstream defaults (gtk+-2 AFAIK) since it's most common, |
4 |
> > tested, and supported configuration. If/when upstream moves to |
5 |
> > gtk+-3, we'd just follow. |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > I also understand we have users who are eager to run various |
8 |
> > configurations, and expect Gentoo to be flexible and allow that. |
9 |
> > Would masking a gtk3 USE flag for www-client/chromium be |
10 |
> > acceptable? Are there any other solutions that might work? |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > Paweł |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> x11-misc/spacefm supports multiple toolkits as well. I stay in line |
15 |
> with GNOME suggestions by making gtk3 the default, but gtk2 |
16 |
> configurable via USE. Versioned USE flags are generally frowned upon, |
17 |
> but I see no better way to support both a GTK3 default *and* allow for |
18 |
> the GTK2 support. Part of the reason I came to Gentoo (and became a |
19 |
> dev) is to support user choice, and personally as a maintainer that |
20 |
> matters more than suggestions. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> If the GNOME team has a solid recommendation for supporting both GTK2 |
23 |
> and 3, I'll read it. But for now, defaulting IUSE to gtk3 and allowing |
24 |
> the user to set gtk2 is the best of both worlds imo. |
25 |
|
26 |
The chromium upstream recommends gtk2, so it should be the default, |
27 |
even if the GNOME team recommends gtk3. |
28 |
|
29 |
Best regards, |
30 |
Andrew Savchenko |