1 |
Hello All Gentoo Developers! |
2 |
|
3 |
I would like to introduce myself and thank everyone for the effort that |
4 |
you have put into creating an exceptional GNU/Linux distribution. I |
5 |
have successfully installed Gentoo on a 900 MHz Anthlon, 128 MB mem, 40 |
6 |
GB hd, a 300 MHz Pentium II, 128 MB mem, 10 GB hd, and even an ageing |
7 |
Pentium 166 MHz, 16 MB mem, 2 GB hd notebook. I will try and sort |
8 |
through my notes on getting Gentoo up and running on these machines and |
9 |
post feedback comments to the group. Hopefully, these will be of use to |
10 |
someone. |
11 |
|
12 |
I noticed that Daniel had added linux-2.4.5-ac5 to the package.mask due |
13 |
to lock up problems. I have experienced similiar problems after my |
14 |
kernel was inadvertenly upgraded while upgrading another package |
15 |
(presumbly before 2.4.5 was added to package.mask). The problem seemed |
16 |
to be premature and runaway swappage, especially when dealing with large |
17 |
files. Reviewing the kernel mailing list indicates this to be a known |
18 |
problem. However, I do not experience the swapping problems with the |
19 |
2.4.4-ac5 kernel. This brings me to my long-winded question. The |
20 |
consensus on the kernel mailing list seems to be that you need to have |
21 |
swap=2*RAM for 2.4 kernels. Unfortunately, I partitioned my drives with |
22 |
swap=1*RAM (habit from the 2.2 series I suppose). I would be interested |
23 |
in how much swap relative to RAM other gentoo users have partitioned |
24 |
and whether they have been experiencing similar problems. I need to |
25 |
decide if I should repartition for swap = 2 * RAM now to avoid |
26 |
problems with future updates to the kernel. |
27 |
|
28 |
Once again, thanks for the good work. |
29 |
|
30 |
Tod Neidt |