| 1 |
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> We should probably consider extending the INSTALL_MASK a bit. A good |
| 3 |
> idea would be to allow repositories to pre-define names |
| 4 |
> for INSTALL_MASK (alike USE flags) and allow portage to control them |
| 5 |
> over those names. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
We'd need a corresponding way to unmask stuff as well, if we went that |
| 8 |
route. It would add value for stuff like the embedded profile, but I |
| 9 |
wouldn't want to see it used in the base profiles. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Rich |
Archives