From: | "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <flameeyes@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Features That Depend on Binaries [WAS: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Re: 2.1 release candidate soon? ] | ||
Date: | Thu, 20 Apr 2006 04:18:06 | ||
Message-Id: | 200604200612.14846@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Portage Features That Depend on Binaries [WAS: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Re: 2.1 release candidate soon? ] by Alec Warner |
1 | On Thursday 20 April 2006 05:28, Alec Warner wrote: |
2 | > Is there any problem with adding dev-util/confcache and dev-util/ccache |
3 | > to info_pkgs? |
4 | Being the one to take the pieces of confcache, I'm _really_ happy to see that |
5 | happening :) |
6 | |
7 | -- |
8 | Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/ |
9 | Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE |