| 1 |
Why are you replying to a thread that has already been resolved? Please stop. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 4:43 AM, Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@×××××.de> wrote: |
| 4 |
> * Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o> schrieb: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>> If it turns out there is no easier way of properly fixing this, |
| 7 |
>> we may have to split poppler-utils out from poppler. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> ACK. Having separate packages for public libraries and utils |
| 10 |
> which just happen to use these libs should be the default case. |
| 11 |
> Not just because of circular deps - which, in 99.99% have |
| 12 |
> absolutely _no_ technical reason, beside certain people's mental |
| 13 |
> lazyness (at least that's what my about 20yrs swe experience |
| 14 |
> shows up ;-o) - but also a matter of clean sw design. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> This should start at the source, so if upstream doesnt want to |
| 17 |
> fix this, let's fork. (i'm hereby volunteering as maintainer). |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> cu |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> PS: please no "we're not debian"-flamewars ;-o |
| 23 |
> -- |
| 24 |
> --------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 25 |
> Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ |
| 26 |
> --------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 27 |
> Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: |
| 28 |
> http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce |
| 29 |
> Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: |
| 30 |
> http://patches.metux.de/ |
| 31 |
> --------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
~Nirbheek Chauhan |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team |
Archives