| 1 |
On Mon, 2021-09-27 at 20:01 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 2 |
> > > > > > On Mon, 27 Sep 2021, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > You seem to be missing the fact that all of them hardcode "bzr". |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Yes, and it is updated to "brz" in a followup commit. Would you prefer |
| 7 |
> leaving them as "bzr"? I guess that backwards compatibility link will |
| 8 |
> stay there for a long time. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
What I'm saying is that if anyone overrides these commands, they will be |
| 11 |
broken when the symlink disappears. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Then ofc there's the basic problem if anyone will ever actually need to |
| 14 |
do that. This doesn't sound likely for eclass that we expect to have |
| 15 |
approximately one consumer. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Best regards, |
| 19 |
Michał Górny |
Archives