| 1 |
On 24 Jul 2004, at 20:36, Pieter Van den Abeele wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> On 24 Jul 2004, at 18:59, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>> On Saturday 24 July 2004 12:54 pm, Pieter Van den Abeele wrote: |
| 7 |
>>> There are some ways to make repoman not complain about macos: |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> everything you described seems like a big old hack |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> why not update your profile to point all your 'virtual packages' at a |
| 12 |
>> real |
| 13 |
>> virtual package ... it can be done with adding all your 300+ hacked |
| 14 |
>> entries |
| 15 |
>> to the virtuals file ... that should fix all the errors |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> I didn't do that because that doesn't work. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Try adding |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> app-shells/bash sys-libs/libsystem |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> to your profile virtuals, then try to emerge bash. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Also, how do versions come into play? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
obviously emerge fakeA-1.0 would be realized by real-1.0 and fakeB-2.0 |
| 28 |
would be realized by real-2.0. I don't think portage allows to specify |
| 29 |
some form of version-relation between a virtual and its realization, |
| 30 |
right? Like, libsystem-7.1 provides bash-3, xfree-435 , .... In portage |
| 31 |
.51_pre13, can the same package provides, multiple virtuals, each with |
| 32 |
an appropriate version. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Pieter |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
> Best regards, |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
> Pieter Van den Abeele |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
-- |
| 45 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives