Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: hasufell <hasufell@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] bash-3.1 stable
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 12:32:38
Message-Id: 515ACFDA.4090605@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] bash-3.1 stable by Alexis Ballier
1 On 04/02/2013 02:29 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
2 > On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 14:25:43 +0200
3 > hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote:
4 >
5 >> bash-3.1 seems to break ebuild sourcing and is blocked in most package
6 >> managers. So I was wondering how can it still be stable then or even
7 >> in the tree? I'd say mask it with a note that this breaks the shit
8 >> out of gentoo, no matter what PM you use. Otherwise, just punt it?
9 >>
10 >
11 > (this is pure speculation and I didn't check)
12 >
13 > isn't it the pivot of some upgrade path like 'update bash to 3.1,
14 > portage to xx.xx, bash to latest, portage to latest' ?
15 >
16 > Alexis.
17 >
18
19 afair the upgrade path was for 1 year?
20
21 3.1 is blocked way longer

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] bash-3.1 stable Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o>