1 |
Dnia 2013-08-15, o godz. 11:10:31 |
2 |
Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> napisał(a): |
3 |
|
4 |
> >>>>> On Thu, 15 Aug 2013, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> > I don't fully understand why things (like in_iuse from |
7 |
> > eutils.eclass) are missing from PMS. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> How should this feature have made it into PMS by now? AFAICS, you've |
10 |
> first proposed it in the following posting, two days after EAPI 5 was |
11 |
> approved: |
12 |
> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/260662 |
13 |
|
14 |
I don't know who's at fault here. I committed it due to some earlier |
15 |
thread where Ciaran pointed out how querying ${IUSE} is invalid. And I |
16 |
suspect that wasn't the first time when he replied to developers using |
17 |
such hacks. |
18 |
|
19 |
Why nobody bothered to fix it the first time it was noticed broken? |
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
Best regards, |
23 |
Michał Górny |