1 |
On 09/09/2015 06:14 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> |
4 |
> Right... So, back to the issue at hand. If a package -always- |
5 |
> depends on a gtk (usually gtk2), but can optionally be configured to |
6 |
> depend on gtk3 instead (and it should be optional because support |
7 |
> isn't clearly stable yet), what's the solution here? |
8 |
> |
9 |
|
10 |
Provide the gtk3 version in an overlay (without gtk3 USE flag), because |
11 |
that's where experimental stuff belongs. If people want to test it, they |
12 |
can do it an we don't have to use ugly stuff like package.use.stable.mask. |