| 1 |
On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 17:32:22 +0200 |
| 2 |
hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 10/09/2015 01:17 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: |
| 5 |
> > commit: 5220bb29741e1685b42a6312c0b7bf2821672040 |
| 6 |
> > Author: Alexis Ballier <aballier <AT> gentoo <DOT> org> |
| 7 |
> > AuthorDate: Fri Oct 9 11:16:38 2015 +0000 |
| 8 |
> > Commit: Alexis Ballier <aballier <AT> gentoo <DOT> org> |
| 9 |
> > CommitDate: Fri Oct 9 11:16:52 2015 +0000 |
| 10 |
> > URL: |
| 11 |
> > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=5220bb29 |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > eclass: ros-catkin.eclass: Use cmake-utils_src_make instead of |
| 14 |
> > plain emake for src_test so that it works with ninja too. |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Please try to use short summary lines and put more detailed |
| 19 |
> description into the commit message after a newline, also see |
| 20 |
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Gentoo_git_workflow#Example |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> The prefix is also a bit uncommon, see |
| 23 |
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Gentoo_git_workflow#Commit_message_format |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
yeah, got that wrong; thx; i tried to remember it as '$dir: message', |
| 26 |
which works in all but this case it seems :) |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
> Ofc, I will expect people to jump in and say "the council hasn't |
| 29 |
> decided on that yet", but well... it mostly works fine and is not |
| 30 |
> really controversial. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
not sure if council approval is needed; uniformity and consistency is |
| 33 |
way more important than whatever syntax is used |
Archives