Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] libgphoto2-2.4.10 news item
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 19:32:07
Message-Id: 1297625483.7535.4.camel@localhost.localdomain
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] libgphoto2-2.4.10 news item by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 17:09 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 > On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 18:03:41 +0100
3 > Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote:
4 > > Please see attached news item for reviewing as part of the fix for
5 > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346491
6 >
7 > CAMERAS=* shouldn't be legal. Since the strict IUSE stuff was dropped
8 > from EAPI 4, and since IUSE isn't complete in any EAPI, there's no way
9 > of implementing it correctly.
10 >
11 > If you want to default to enabling a whole load of stuff, but allowing
12 > users to override that, then you do it by listing things explicitly in
13 > profiles.
14 >
15
16 Wouldn't be any shorter way to build all CAMERAS? We don't want to
17 default to enabling all, with the new way of handling this, if CAMERAS
18 is not set or is empty, nothing will be built but, if CAMERAS="*"
19 shouldn't be used, what should we use instead of having to manually add
20 all of them to make.conf (from a user point of view)
21
22 Thanks

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] libgphoto2-2.4.10 news item Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>