| 1 |
Carsten Lohrke <carlo@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> use.local.desc:app-text/ghostscript-afpl:jasper - Enable support for |
| 3 |
> jpeg2k (jasper) |
| 4 |
> use.local.desc:kde-base/kdegraphics:jpeg2k - Enable support for jpeg2k |
| 5 |
> (jasper) |
| 6 |
> use.local.desc:kde-base/kdelibs:jpeg2k - Enable support for jpeg2k |
| 7 |
> (jasper) |
| 8 |
> use.local.desc:net-proxy/ziproxy:jpeg2k - Enable support for jpeg2k |
| 9 |
> (jasper) |
| 10 |
> use.local.desc:sci-libs/gdal:jasper - Adds support for JPEG 2000 |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I was just about adding another one and thought it would be better to merge |
| 14 |
> them to a global jpeg2k use flag. Complains? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Query: Which would be more appropriate in this case? "jasper" for the |
| 17 |
library it pulls in as a depend, or "jpeg2k" for the functionality that |
| 18 |
library provides? There's nothing else in the tree (as far as I can |
| 19 |
tell) which provides JPEG-2000, but there could be. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
I used to think romantic love was a neurosis shared by two, a supreme |
| 23 |
foolishness. I no longer thought that. There's nothing foolish in |
| 24 |
loving anyone. Thinking you'll be loved in return is what's foolish. |
| 25 |
-- Rita Mae Brown |
Archives