1 |
Marius Mauch <genone@g.o> said: |
2 |
> Yeah, unfortunately none of the people proposing the idea ever wrote a |
3 |
> glep or even filed a bug regarding this (AFAIK), also as the quoted |
4 |
> threads show there are a number of possible solutions for this. |
5 |
|
6 |
It doesn't seem that too many people feel strongly in favor of it (judging by |
7 |
responses so far), so why don't we just say that it is invalid until such a |
8 |
time where someone can come up with real-life examples where this would prove |
9 |
to be beneficial. Is this something that repoman could check for (should I |
10 |
file a bug), or just something to keep my eye out for? |
11 |
|
12 |
I don't see this as a groundbreaking change that requires a GLEP or anything, |
13 |
especially since I eliminated most of the duplicates today, after talking |
14 |
with the respective maintainers. There are probably only 3 or 4 left. |
15 |
|
16 |
-- |
17 |
Mark Loeser - Gentoo Developer (cpp gcc-porting qa toolchain x86) |
18 |
email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org |
19 |
mark AT halcy0n DOT com |
20 |
web - http://dev.gentoo.org/~halcy0n/ |
21 |
http://www.halcy0n.com |