| 1 |
On Tuesday 01 May 2012 11:06:42 William Hubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:59:02AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > the fact that the script leaves your system in a hard to recover state is |
| 4 |
> > what i'm whining about, not that udev requires devtmpfs. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> So why did you decide to whine instead of opening a bug? :p |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
based on past behavior, i assumed it was operating as indented |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> > we already have examples of the init scripts modifying /etc/issue to |
| 11 |
> > notify login entry points that their system needs manual attention to |
| 12 |
> > recover. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> This part can't happen in the udev init script since / is ro when it is |
| 15 |
> run. Doing something in udev-postmount is also eroneous because that |
| 16 |
> assumes that the user is booting to the default runlevel which they may |
| 17 |
> not be. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
in the past, we would `mount -o remount,rw /`, but that was because we needed |
| 20 |
to add missing dirs in /. |
| 21 |
-mike |
Archives