| 1 |
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Tomáš Chvátal <tomas.chvatal@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> If you as developers and users find some package useful you can retake |
| 3 |
> the maintainership (or became proxy-maint) which also expects you to |
| 4 |
> take care of the bugs (QA can prune it even if you take the |
| 5 |
> maintainership but ignore failures [even if your personal feeling is |
| 6 |
> that it is corner case, it is for QA to deicde]). |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Citation? I don't see any GLEPs or other Council-approved policies to |
| 9 |
that effect. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
And this is of course why nobody actually wants to maintain these |
| 12 |
packages - everybody is going to be looking over your shoulder because |
| 13 |
they've already decided that the existence of the package bothers |
| 14 |
them. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Honestly, threads like this bug me so much that I'm half-tempted to |
| 17 |
take over maintainership of one of these packages just to be a test |
| 18 |
case... Ugh - time for an email break... |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Rich |
Archives