| 1 |
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 3:51 AM, Alexander Berntsen <bernalex@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On 05/09/15 14:53, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 4 |
>> I was suggesting that somebody talk to the portage developers about |
| 5 |
>> how they intend to implement EAPI6 |
| 6 |
> We don't know. But our tardiness should not retard the development of |
| 7 |
> other package managers. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
This wouldn't hold up developers of other package managers, just the |
| 11 |
change to the eclass. I wasn't suggesting waiting until EAPI6 was |
| 12 |
implemented, or securing a 100% binding commitment from anybody. I |
| 13 |
was just suggesting that users might not like having two different |
| 14 |
variables that end up doing the same thing, simply because nobody |
| 15 |
bothered to talk to anybody else. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
If you ask and there is no answer I wouldn't hold things up. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Rich |
Archives