Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Stuart Herbert <stuart@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Experiment: confcache patch for portage-2.0.50-r10
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 17:40:12
Message-Id: 200409101840.06608.stuart@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Experiment: confcache patch for portage-2.0.50-r10 by Paul de Vrieze
1 On Friday 10 September 2004 09:06, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
2 > Great. One other thing is that many configure functions also support some
3 > kind of presets where the answers can be provided (site configuration) in
4 > `PREFIX/etc/config.site'. This is not a cache but a way to set defaults.
5 > I think we could also look into that.
6 >
7 > Paul
8
9 Sounds like a good idea. I'll leave that as an exercise for the reader ;-)
10
11 Best regards,
12 Stu
13 --
14 Stuart Herbert stuart@g.o
15 Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/
16 http://stu.gnqs.org/diary/
17
18 GnuPG key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu
19 Key fingerprint = 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C
20 --