| 1 |
Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: |
| 2 |
> Maybe I'm thinking things too difficult, why not just define both -D |
| 3 |
> PHP and -D PHP5 in the transition period and suggest this config for |
| 4 |
> any change? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Because it mostly just defers the problem. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
If the desire is to move away from PHP5 then I would suggest to force |
| 9 |
a failure when starting Apache, if PHP5 is defined when PHP is required. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Ie. fail closed. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I can be talked into supporting the idea to only print a warning when |
| 14 |
PHP5 is set and to not fail (no source served) for some period of |
| 15 |
time until which the forced failure starts, if PHP5 is still set. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Don't fail open, fail closed. Since manual interaction is required |
| 18 |
some people will forget or overlook it, and will get a failure. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I would introduce the failure right away, but maybe a warning will |
| 21 |
make some happy who would otherwise have gotten a failure. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
//Peter |
Archives