Archives
Archives
| From: | Alon Bar-Lev <alonbl@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] gnupg-2 stable plans | ||
| Date: | Wed, 12 Dec 2007 12:29:06 | ||
| Message-Id: | 9e0cf0bf0712120426o5e7c943dg1e3f5070f34dcb65@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] gnupg-2 stable plans by "Jan Kundrát" |
||
| 1 | On 12/12/07, Jan Kundrát <jkt@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > Alon Bar-Lev wrote: |
| 3 | > > As I told you before, I wont slot these two. |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > Could you provide a link to reasons that lead you to this decision so |
| 6 | > that interested readers can make their own opinion? |
| 7 | |
| 8 | http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159623 |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Best Regards, |
| 11 | Alon Bar-Lev. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] gnupg-2 stable plans | "William L. Thomson Jr." <wltjr@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] gnupg-2 stable plans | "Jan Kundrát" <jkt@g.o> |