| 1 |
Come on Jason, this whole message was a prank, largely suggested by the rest |
| 2 |
of this thread :). |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
George |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
On Thursday 14 October 2004 17:57, Jason Huebel wrote: |
| 7 |
> On Tuesday 12 October 2004 4:37 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 8 |
> > Also, I suggest we drop the amd64 keyword and just use x86 to save |
| 9 |
> > space, since we all know fine well that amd64 is just like x86 with a |
| 10 |
> > few extra bits stuck onto the end. Or rather, the start, since x86 gets |
| 11 |
> > its bytes backwards... |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I'll be very succinct here... NO. Your assumption is incorrect. Period. |
| 14 |
> Don't bring it up again. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives