| 1 |
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 01:52:32PM +0200, Henti Smith wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 23 May 2003 13:01:26 +0100 |
| 3 |
> Dhruba Bandopadhyay <dhruba@××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > - Please please, do not submit ebuilds for version bumps unless necessary and |
| 7 |
> > > if necessary tell us what changed. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > Version bump only when necessary? What does this mean? Isn't keeping |
| 10 |
> > up to date a basic requirement to maintain a modern tree? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I agree .... if this was that case I would still be using slackware or something since I can "update" the packaes I have installed when "needed" |
| 13 |
> I use gentoo so I can get the latest mplayer a few days after it comes out etc etc |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> otherwise whats the point of having gentoo and portage .. ? |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Henti |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> -- |
| 20 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I missed most of this thread due to time constraints and may be just |
| 23 |
jumping in at the wrong place, but as a matter of policy, version bumps |
| 24 |
are always a plus. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Jon Portnoy |
| 28 |
avenj/irc.freenode.net |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives