1 |
Why do I have a feeling this is another "great proposal" which everyone |
2 |
agreed with but didn't bother to go further and suggest it's |
3 |
implementation? Can someone update me on the status? Probably a GLEP is |
4 |
required, then I could right it. |
5 |
|
6 |
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 16:24:36 -0400 |
7 |
Jason Wever <weeve@g.o> wrote: |
8 |
|
9 |
> Hi All, |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Since our -dev mailing list is now receiving an enormous amount of |
12 |
> traffic each day, I'd like to suggest bringing/bring back up the |
13 |
> summaries idea previously mentioned a few months ago. Due to the fact |
14 |
> that we all have limited time to work on Gentoo, and we can't spend |
15 |
> all of it reading the 50+ emails on -dev every day (not to mention |
16 |
> other list(s) we may be on).. So please, if a thread ends up resulting |
17 |
> in something devs need to read(i.e. policy changes), please make a |
18 |
> summary email. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Also, for sparc, if you want us to test something, it is *HIGHLY |
21 |
> SUGGESTED* that you make a bug for it and CC the sparc team on it |
22 |
> <sparc@g.o>. As I've mentioned in the above paragraph about |
23 |
> email overload, it's easy for your test request to get lost in the |
24 |
> shuffle(especially if it's at the top of the 50+ emails to read). |
25 |
> This will guarantee the best response from the team. If you want to |
26 |
> do whatever with your ebuild(s) in the test request by a certain date, |
27 |
> please indicate that in the bug. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> Thanks, |
30 |
> -- |
31 |
> Jason Wever |
32 |
> Gentoo/Sparc Team Lead |
33 |
> |
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
Let the Force be with us! |
38 |
Sergey Kuleshov <svyatogor@g.o> |
39 |
Public Key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~sergey/gentoo-gpg |