| 1 |
On 17 September 2014 01:44, Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> bottom of the comment a clearsign on the contents of the commit? |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I don't see that being useful as written, because that's presently exactly |
| 8 |
what git does. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
the very best I think you could do is sign the commit *diff*, ie: |
| 11 |
recursively compare TREE and PARENT->TREE and feed only *new* objects |
| 12 |
through GPG. That's the most meaningful thing you'll get. ( And it really |
| 13 |
is up-streams responsibility to implement this feature if they care, |
| 14 |
bolting it on after the fact is horrible ) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Kent |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
*KENTNL* - https://metacpan.org/author/KENTNL |
Archives