Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Christian Faulhammer <opfer@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: GPL violations with net-misc/vpnc?
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 18:11:31
Message-Id: 20070831163147.39ab2520@localhost
1 Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o>:
2
3 > > While we are not distributing binaries, I could easily add a
4 > > USE flag to enable it; the user compiles it himself, so it is all
5 > > fine. But now regard the existence of binary hosts, are they
6 > > distributions of then illegal binaries?
7 > isn't bindist useflag made for this purpose ?
8
9 Great. Thanks...so what is common practice? Should the ebuild die,
10 telling people a feature will not be included or just exclude it with
11 an ewarn only?
12
13 V-Li
14
15 --
16 Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
17 <URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode
18
19 <URL:http://www.faulhammer.org/>

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: GPL violations with net-misc/vpnc? Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GPL violations with net-misc/vpnc? "Olivier Crête" <tester@g.o>