| 1 |
That sounds strange to me :/ What about the output for emerge --pretend? It |
| 2 |
wouldn't show you the smae package in the list twice, will it? The only |
| 3 |
workaround I can suggest is to mask all package versions which are higher |
| 4 |
than those needed by latest wrapper script... |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
On Friday 13 February 2004 00:52, Paul Smith wrote: |
| 7 |
> Instead what seems to happen is that emerge sees the DEPEND with no |
| 8 |
> version in local/xxx-1.1 and pulls in the latest local/zzz. Then it |
| 9 |
> proceeds along and sometime later it discovers that it really wanted an |
| 10 |
> earlier version so it installs that instead. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Not only that, but I tried to arrange my packages in the wrapper DEPEND |
| 13 |
> so that the ones that didn't depend on anything were first, etc. so |
| 14 |
> that, if emerge did them in order, I'd get the right versions in the |
| 15 |
> end. I didn't expect to have to do this but I tried it anyway; no |
| 16 |
> help. Emerge merges them in some seemingly random order anyway. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> I'm using Portage 2.0.49. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Can someone give me some tips/help/pointers/debugging advice/anything? |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> I'm pretty stuck here :-(. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Sergey Kuleshov <svyatogor@g.o> |
| 27 |
Home Page: http://dev.gentoo.org/~sergey |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives