Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Johannes Huber <johu@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 12:53:48
Message-Id: 2427401.lzvKUfhUMv@marin
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver by Michael Weber
Am Mittwoch 23 Mai 2012, 14:42:37 schrieb Michael Weber:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi, > > i've looked at the blockers of "[TRACKER] portage migration to git" > [1] and want to discuss "testing git-cvsserver" [2]. > > There are two proposed scenarios how to migrate the developers write > access to the portage tree. > > "Clean cut" turns of cvs access on a given and announced timestamp, > rsync-generation/updates is suspended (no input -> no changes), some > magic scripts prepare the git repo (according to [3], some hours > duration) and we all checkout the tree (might be some funny massive load). > > "testing git-cvsserver" proses "Clean cut" with the additional ability > to continue using cvs update/commit, - in best case - on the old > checkout w/o alteration on the developers side. > > "Clean cut" forces us to clean up out dirty checkouts (I have some > added directories, added ebuilds i hesitated to `repoman commit`). > Plus we have to alter all our hot-wired portage mangling scripts from > cvs'ish to git'ish (I use my read/write checkout as portage tree (cvs > checkout + egencache for checkout) and have an automated google-chrome > bump script). But this can be accomplished on a per developer basis, > and slackers don't stall the process. > > "testing git-cvsserver" forces us all to test these cvs'ish scripts > and behaviours against a git-cvsserver and report. > We all know that this test-runs will never happen, stalling this bug > till infinity. > Plus infra/"subset of devs marshalling the migration" get stuck > between fixing git issues and git-cvsserver. > > *if you still read this* *wow* > > Please discuss my arguments and come to the conclusions to > RESO/WONT-FIX "testing git-cvsserver", make a "clean cut" and remove > this bug from the blockers of "[TRACKER] portage migration to git". > > My lengthy 2 cents. > > [1] > [2] > [3] > - -- > Gentoo Dev > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - > > iF4EAREIAAYFAk+82z0ACgkQknrdDGLu8JBUWAD/dmuqyES/mYDrMam+/txnHmgd > VaQaqwHMlwzzqQwbpY4A/0h+5Vp8sLbOE78k4SCaGE2dCQtmeOz0jd1YxkDzP+YW > =jXLQ > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
I support RESOLUTION WONTFIX, if nobody cares about the bug since it was opened it is obvious out of interest. There is no reason to support jurassic software. Clean cut++ Cheers -- Johannes Huber (johu) Gentoo Linux Developer / KDE Team GPG Key ID F3CFD2BD


File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature