1 |
>>>>> On Mon, 29 Oct 2012, Matthew Thode wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> It's looking hard to be able to add the spotify ebuild to tree because |
4 |
> of licensing concerns. |
5 |
|
6 |
> http://www.spotify.com/us/legal/end-user-agreement/ |
7 |
|
8 |
This concerns not so much the client software, but their "service" and |
9 |
the contents provided through it. |
10 |
|
11 |
> 10:02 < prometheanfire > do you have a plaintext version? I can copy |
12 |
> the text, but just thought I'd ask :D |
13 |
> 10:02 < dan^spotify > No, and copy+pasting it into a text file isn't |
14 |
> something we really want you to to do, since it changes from time-to-time |
15 |
> 10:04 < prometheanfire > ok, I'll see what the proper course of action |
16 |
> is, I think you have us accept the license on first start right? |
17 |
> 10:04 < dan^spotify > Correct |
18 |
> 10:04 < dan^spotify > Well, first login |
19 |
> 10:05 < prometheanfire > just as good probably |
20 |
> 10:05 < dan^spotify > If you've already accepted the most up-to-date |
21 |
> license on another machine, you won't be prompted again |
22 |
|
23 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373093 |
24 |
|
25 |
> They want it to be accepted through the app. Is there a way this is |
26 |
> compatible with Gentoo? |
27 |
|
28 |
We need a plaintext license file for the client that we put in |
29 |
${PORTDIR}licenses/, so users can look at it before they install the |
30 |
package. |
31 |
|
32 |
> Any advice would be appreciated. |
33 |
|
34 |
Maybe it would make more sense to add one of the free alternatives? |
35 |
|
36 |
http://despotify.se/ |
37 |
https://gitorious.org/libopenspotify |
38 |
|
39 |
media-sound/despotify is already in Sunrise, bug 307795. |
40 |
|
41 |
Ulrich |