| 1 |
On 23 June 2010 01:47, Mike Auty <ikelos@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
[...] |
| 3 |
>> Which should not be an issue since any library that has some sort of |
| 4 |
>> introspection can use this flag (and the use.desc can be changed |
| 5 |
>> appropriately at that time if it does not use gobject-introspection). |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Why have to change it in the future (and probably split it into two |
| 8 |
> flags then), when the choice hasn't been made yet? Or, to put your own |
| 9 |
> question to you, why are you vehemently for "introspection" when others |
| 10 |
> have shown concern with the choice? As far as I can see, the only |
| 11 |
> difference is requiring a slightly longer use_enable line. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Mostly because I don't want to coin a new term if it's not absolutely necessary. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
That said, you're right - more people seem to be comfortable with |
| 16 |
"gintrospection" than plain "introspection". If no further objections |
| 17 |
arise, we'll go with "gintrospection". |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Thanks, |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Arun Raghavan |
| 22 |
http://arunraghavan.net/ |
| 23 |
(Ford_Prefect | Gentoo) & (arunsr | GNOME) |
Archives