Archives
Archives
| From: | Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-libs/libuv: libuv-1.2.1.ebuild ChangeLog | ||
| Date: | Sat, 17 Jan 2015 17:30:44 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20150117173033.21194.qmail@stuge.se | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-libs/libuv: libuv-1.2.1.ebuild ChangeLog by Patrick Lauer |
||
| 1 | Patrick Lauer wrote: |
| 2 | > > Do you, as QA team member, think that a review workflow improves quality? |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > No. |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > Bureaucracy does not improve quality by itself. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | A review workflow isn't about bureaucracy, it's about review. :) |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Now, review means different things to different people, and some will |
| 11 | sometimes do mediocre review and consider that sufficient while |
| 12 | others will usually always do excellent review. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | //Peter |