| 1 |
Ian Stakenvicius posted on Tue, 06 Aug 2013 10:47:05 -0400 as excerpted: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Or alternatively, rc-net ? |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> (google seems to reference 'rc' as 'remote control' as in race cars, |
| 6 |
> airplanes, etc; but given /etc/rc.* and /etc/init* have been around |
| 7 |
> forever and have always been called the "rc" system, i think we should |
| 8 |
> be safe using it) |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Hmm... sounds like something the NSA could love if there's ever a |
| 11 |
remotely exploitable vuln. Remote-control-net indeed! =:^( |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Never-the less, it's still reasonable even if I like the net-rc idea |
| 14 |
better. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 18 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 19 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
Archives