| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 08/22/2013 08:38 AM, Sergey Popov wrote: |
| 5 |
> 21.08.2013 22:28, Alexis Ballier пишет: |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> Instead of dropping them entirely to ~arch, maybe something in |
| 8 |
>> between could be done: Said arches could start moving to ~arch |
| 9 |
>> the leaf and less important packages. E.g. we have (had?) a lot |
| 10 |
>> of sparc keywords on sound packages or ppc keywords on ocaml ones |
| 11 |
>> because at some point (~10 years ago) some dev was interested in |
| 12 |
>> these on this architecture but I'm pretty sure nobody uses them. |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> In short: Reduce stable coverage to reduce the workload. |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> Also, from what I've seen in the thread, you are talking about |
| 17 |
>> keywords only, right ? Do these arches keep their stable mark in |
| 18 |
>> profiles.desc? |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> I like this way much more. Let's clarify stabilization policy for |
| 22 |
> some minor arches, e.g. policy about stabilization requests for |
| 23 |
> huge packages. Cause dropping entire arch to ~arch maybe sometimes |
| 24 |
> a bit overkill. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
And hard to revert. Sparc did drop a lot of keywords lately, by removing |
| 27 |
itself from STABLEREQ w/o stabling the mentioned package. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
- -- |
| 31 |
Michael Weber |
| 32 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 33 |
web: https://xmw.de/ |
| 34 |
mailto: Michael Weber <xmw@g.o> |
| 35 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 36 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) |
| 37 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAlIVt8cACgkQknrdDGLu8JCfxgD/X6HlUv7pPFuo75aOhs1bT9Cc |
| 40 |
PqF799Z9yYsPX+042yoA/RZ2xwKaNUEIlL6XbOKpC0SivlMFIHxBxlzYeRACcPJU |
| 41 |
=yu+s |
| 42 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives