1 |
On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 19:36 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
3 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Aron Griffis wrote: |
6 |
> > That bug is complaining that xterm is installed, and requests that it |
7 |
> > not be necessary. I don't see how this leads to virtual/term, |
8 |
> > though. After all, they didn't request Gentoo to make sure there is |
9 |
> > a terminal installed. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> You are correct that this wasn't the request. It was a potential |
12 |
> solution to that request that had previously been discussed among X |
13 |
> folks as a solution to the problem that people had another terminal |
14 |
> emulator and didn't want two. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> > How about making a local USE "xterm" for xorg-x11, then adding it to |
17 |
> > the default list? Then such users can USE=-xterm and they'll be all |
18 |
> > set. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> I've already elaborated on how we provide a complete X implementation as |
21 |
> upstream does. We've just taken the liberty of splitting it out into two |
22 |
> separate ebuilds, one for xterm and one for everything else. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> A terminal emulator is not considered an optional part of a complete X |
25 |
> implementation. I'm willing to deviate from that by saying any emulator |
26 |
> could be acceptable rather than just xterm, but perhaps that was a bad idea. |
27 |
|
28 |
Worth noticing here. The -default- X environment launches xterms, and |
29 |
will break without xterm. This is the same for any and all tests that |
30 |
are documented in "get X to work" things. |
31 |
|
32 |
So, if you are in that situation, xterm is not optional. :-) |
33 |
|
34 |
And frankly, I don't think you want to build in "find my xterm" logic |
35 |
in the X startup scripts. |
36 |
|
37 |
//Spider |
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
begin .signature |
41 |
Tortured users / Laughing in pain |
42 |
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. |
43 |
end |