| 1 |
forwarding this one... |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Monday 24 June 2002 18:15, Thilo Bangert wrote: |
| 4 |
> due to the reasons stated above, cvs ebuilds are very unlikely added |
| 5 |
> to official portage though... |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Well all you'd have to do is state somewhere that you can't support the |
| 8 |
cvs ebuilds. mplayer for example is rapidly developing and the cvs has |
| 9 |
never failed to build for me but they don't do releases very often. |
| 10 |
This is where a cvs ebuild would be great to have. With mplayer it's |
| 11 |
no too great a problem to not have it under portage control as it |
| 12 |
doesn't install too many files and you can always install into your |
| 13 |
own directory in /usr/local but if you do that for too many software |
| 14 |
packages this becomes crappy even with /etc/env.d. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Alex |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary |
| 21 |
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." |
| 22 |
Benjamin Franklin |
Archives