| 1 |
Hi all, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
I'm splitting the thread because this is a separate subject. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 12:59:56AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: |
| 6 |
> I do understand why Roy refer this as oldnet... but why in Gentoo do |
| 7 |
> we keep the term old? The functionality of these script is huge, and |
| 8 |
> is better than most distros out there. Do we want keep users out of |
| 9 |
> it? are we going to obsolete this huge work? If we don't I suggest to |
| 10 |
> remove the 'old' implication, to something like openrc-gentoo-net. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Actually the plan is to generalize it so that it works with other init |
| 13 |
systems. Right now it is very tightly integrated with OpenRc, but there |
| 14 |
is interest in changing that, so adding openrc to the name would be |
| 15 |
misleading eventually. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Also, at this point, renaming it would require renaming the repository on |
| 18 |
git.overlays.gentoo.org or fixing the ebuild. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
When Robin and I etalked about the split a while back this was the best |
| 21 |
name we could come up with unfortunately. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
William |
Archives