Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Aaron Bauman <bman@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: On dropping sparc@ from CC on bugs
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 22:07:29
Message-Id: 4481473.IXDqc1jNCF@localhost.localdomain
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] On dropping sparc@ from CC on bugs by Sergei Trofimovich
1 On Monday, September 11, 2017 3:43:13 AM EDT Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
2 > On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 22:18:08 +0000
3 >
4 > bugzilla-daemon@g.o wrote:
5 > > DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL. Also, do not reply via email to the person
6 > > whose email is mentioned below. To comment on this bug, please visit:
7 > >
8 > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=621130
9 > >
10 > > Aaron Bauman <bman@g.o> changed:
11 > > What |Removed |Added
12 > >
13 > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
14 > > -->
15 > > CC|sparc@g.o |
16 > >
17 > > --- Comment #16 from Aaron Bauman <bman@g.o> ---
18 > > sparc was dropped to exp.
19 > >
20 > > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=b5901d8f716555a1479f1
21 > > 2313a2925fcadd177a9
22 > [ CCed gentoo-dev@ to raise general awareness ]
23 >
24 > Why do you need to drop sparc@ from CC on all the bugs?
25 >
26 > It takes away possibility from users using sparc@ to report
27 > test status easily. Even after the bug is closed.
28 >
29 > sh@ and s390@ are also exp profiles and CC is one of mechanisms
30 > to ask arch teams to try keywording/stablereq.
31
32 You're right. Fixed.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: On dropping sparc@ from CC on bugs Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o>