| 1 |
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 22:14:25 +0200 |
| 2 |
Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Another one of the things I'd like to see and help reform with the |
| 4 |
> > council. First off it spends way too much time on EAPI/PMS. There is |
| 5 |
> > no reason to make the council an extension of the portage team. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> As member of the PMS team I agree, we have to reach out to more |
| 8 |
> people. No matter how well Ciaran does the job as editor-in-chief |
| 9 |
> the process needs to be broadened to involve other groups, too. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Which groups who would like to be able to contribute currently feel |
| 12 |
that they can't, why do they feel that and why haven't they said so? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Really, the only big issues we've had with EAPI work are getting Portage |
| 15 |
support and working around a Council that wants to both micro-manage |
| 16 |
every last detail of every last feature and only put in an hour of work |
| 17 |
every two weeks. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives