| 1 |
May I also mention Thunderbird as one of the "Mozilla products" that |
| 2 |
needs some attention? I recently set up a non-~x86 system for someone, |
| 3 |
using thunderbird-bin, and discovered that he got 0.5, rather than 0.7.1 |
| 4 |
(which I have on my ~x86 system). Today I emerge sync'ed, and notice |
| 5 |
that 0.5 doesn't exist at all any more - and everything higher is ~x86. |
| 6 |
mozilla-thunderbird (non-bin) is x86 for 0.6-r2, everything more |
| 7 |
recent is ~x86. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Seeing as this is a -bin package, it seems even less reasonable than |
| 10 |
normal that no x86 ebuild exists in portage, and that the latest x86 |
| 11 |
ebuild (prior to being deleted) was quite old to begin with. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-- Jason Rhinelander |
| 14 |
-- Gossamer Threads, Inc. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Brad Laue wrote: |
| 17 |
> It's that time again! That wonderful time when we all gather around and |
| 18 |
> mark the latest version of the Mozilla products stable on our respective |
| 19 |
> architectures. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Currently Firefox 0.8 is the most often marked stable version in |
| 22 |
> portage, while three revisions of this ebuild and two new versions exist. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> The same issue exists for the other mozilla applications, but their |
| 25 |
> ebuild directories aren't getting as full as Firefoxes, so one thing at |
| 26 |
> a time. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> Arch maintainers, please mark Firefox 0.9.1 or the latest functional |
| 29 |
> version stable and let mozilla@g.o know which versions you need |
| 30 |
> kept. Thanks! |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> Brad |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> -- |
| 35 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives